POS Mining Done Right




Our Team​
StakeMiner is comprised of POS enthusiasts. We put this project together for 2 reasons. A program like this helps strengthen any coins we use in our project. It also helps POS collectors earn more profit from the coins they have.
The StakeMiner team has put a lot of researcxh and time into testing and comparing POS coins to find the best suitable coins to use in our project
Services
StakeMiner offers our investors security in the coins they love the most. We keep everything very verifiable to all of our investors, and we give them peace of mind they can withdraw thier investment any time they choose.
We wanted to offer a way to enhance POS coins and the basis behind them, as well as help the coins we love to become stronger on the market. But, at the same time make POS much more profitable for the Miners who love them.
News & Publications

by Fabian Brian Crane @ 2014-12-20 12:21 PM
Most of the value of newly mined Bitcoins flows out of the ecosystem into purchasing hardware and electricity. We pay for this with Bitcoin's inflation, and it is not farfetched to attribute much of the price decline this year to the inflation rate. It is true that the inflation rate will decrease over time, and if Bitcoin succeeds, the adoption rate will far outpace the inflation rate. But this only gives rise to another question: Will a decreasing mining reward provide sufficient security?
It seems that over the last six months the debate of whether proof of work (PoW) is the right long-term consensus protocol has been intensifying. This is not an accident: For cryptocurrencies, there couldn't be a more fundamental debate than this one. The outcome will likely be one of the biggest factors shaping the crypto-ecosystem of the future. With proof of stake (PoS), a radically different consensus mechanism has been gaining increasing mindshare as a contender.

by VITALIK BUTERIN on AUGUST 26, 2013
There is one SHA256 alternative that is already here, and that essentially does away with the computational waste of proof of work entirely: proof of stake. Rather than requiring the prover to perform a certain amount of computational work, a proof of stake system requires the prover to show ownership of a certain amount of money. The reason why Satoshi could not have done this himself is simple: before 2009, there was no kind of digital property which could securely interact with cryptographic protocols. Paypal and online credit card payments have been around for over ten years, but those systems are centralized, so creating a proof of stake system around them would allow Paypal and credit card providers themselves to cheat it by generating fake transactions. IP addresses and domain names are partially decentralized, but there is no way to construct a proof of ownership of either that could be verified in the future. Indeed, the first digital property that could possibly work with an online proof of stake system is Bitcoin (and cryptocurrency in general) itself.